240 vs 144hz reddit

240 vs 144hz reddit. 17ms between each frame. I don't think you can find any hardware that produces 240 FPS (average) with PUBG at 1080p or 1440p. So, i have the choice between one of the new 1440p 360 hz OLEDs or one of the 4k 240 hz OLEDs. i highly doubt, that the 144hz monitor can do a 240hz refresh window. When I tested a 240hz monitor when I first sat down I really just didn't "feel" any difference between 240 vs 144. The best competitive gamers have a reaction time of 120 ms or so, so either one would spit out dozens of frames between a stimulus and any action taken on the part of the player. Whether or not this is enough to justify the $500 price tag is up to you. So, I’m not actually sure if I will benefit and see noticeable difference if I would get Alienware or Benq 240 hz one. Me personally, I use 4k 60hz monitor and I would never swap to lower resolution in favour of higher refresh rate. To me, 90-100hz is the threshold of motion becoming clean instead of having some sort of choppiness to it. For most people 144hz is more than enough but if you have the money and you really care about squeezing every bit of performance you can then go 240hz could be for you. Yeah- if you think of it this way: 240 hz is a frame time of just over 4 ms. If you want the "best," then you should go for 240hz and make sure it's got all the other bells and whistles (g/freesync, HDR, etc. The main difference was in pixel density (1440p is stunning vs 1080p) and the lack of ghosting the ASUS monitor has. Even moving the cursor on the desktop feels smoother. 8% (142ms divided by 138ms) faster reaction time, at the cost of visibility/detail at distance (1080p vs 1440p) it's a noticeable difference, but I wouldn't throw away a a good 144hz monitor just for the upgrade. com Aug 22, 2022 · Since the RTX 3080 is coming out, I’m am thinking of getting either a 27″ 1440p 240 Hz or a 24. I would go 240 personally. 540 hz is slightly overkill if you "only" have 400 fps but it would still be the better option of the 2 when it comes to competitive advantage. It will also leave room if you end up going with multiple monitors. This is not entirely accurate. It would be great with a 32" 4k 240hz monitor for future proofing but the neo g8 and it's problems is not something that looks future proof or great. Agreed I went 1440 at 144, then at 240, and now 4K at 120 oled, it’s great. But if you like to do more than just play siege on your pc, like watch movies or something, then maybe go for the 1440p The difference between 165 and 240 will be very small. A modern 360/240 vs a modern 120hz OLED, yes you might notice a difference in smoothness. But after thinking all day I agree with what someone else said above, stick with the high resolution 144hz. being a professional doesn't necessarily mean you know more about products/tools in your field, i've learned, lol. As an amateur painter myself, I noticed the Seattle Artists Guild had put out an article on a famous artist's oil painting brushes, even though I took one look at the provided picture and concluded they were watercolor brushes (and they were). Either will be free of charge. 1440p 165hz even a 6950xt at 1440p which beats the 3090ti in 1440p framerates cant really pump 240 fps at 1440p in every game outside of esports titles i and forget about 4k at 144 thats just a pipe dream without dropping settings to low or medium without using upscaling which imo if you bought the horsepower why drop to 1080p for rendering and 240hz is very very good and is definitely noticeable when compared to 144hz. It's not unplayable or unpleasant like playing in 60hz but I can definitely tell when it's 144 or 240. The colors are a lot nicer vs the old benq which looks completely washed out with no contrast in comparison but in csgo it also took a bit to get used to bc some parts feel a bit darker. Am i wrong, which should i go with? NOTE: My goal is not to max out the specifications of the monitor. bots (which is what most of the "high hz testing" done in online videos I've seen uses - the enemy turning the corner and shooting test, etc. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The more, the better. A 144hz monitor shaves it down to 7ms which is why the difference is extremely noticeable while playing. 240 Hz vs 180Hz Looking to upgrade my 1080p 144hz monitor, and I’ve settled on going up to 2k, but the only problem is the price difference between 2k 170/180 hz monitors and 2k 240hz ones. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. Very High FPS+Hz would make a bigger difference in 3ms - 7ms LAN games against other players at a LAN party or vs. gigabyte 28u(28" 4k 144hz 500Eur) or gigabyte 27QX (27" 1440p 240hz 450Eur) my pc: RTX 4090 ryzen 5900x 32gb ram RGB leds (yes this makes my setup faster). In my opinion it’s not worth it to upgrade unless you play games at a highly competitive level and genuinely need the most current frames possible. 5″ 1080p 360Hz monitor can outweigh Jan 10, 2022 · By Samuel Stewart January 10, 2022. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. However, I suppose running the game at 240 FPS or more consistently already costs a lot. To be completely honest, I went from two 75 Hz monitors to two 144 Hz monitors a couple months ago and I really don't notice the difference very much (and yes they are set to 144 Hz in Windows). The higher refresh rate will make your shots more accurate. I have a 1440p 165hz Gysync monitor and I had a high end 280hz 1080p monitor for a few days before I exchanged it, not only did the 280hz 1080p monitor look like complete dogshit compared to the beautiful crispness and color of the 1440p 165hz, but the actual performance "advantage" was negligible and I 144/165 to 240+. 165hz, 170 hz, sure, but 240hz is very doubtful. In other words, it draws the image faster than a 120Hz panel, which means less lag and less probability of tearing (in case you play with vsync off). 170hz feel identical to 144hz, however, 160hz va smearing makes it feel worse than 144hz ips. As others have said, you’re going to be very hard pressed to hit 4K/240 FPS on any relatively modern game even with a 4090 and 13900k unless you lower lots of settings, which kind of defeats the point. Then, apply that knowledge of 60hz to 120hz but divide that intensity in half by every step you go up (i. But Tia definitely not a night and day improvement, 144hz and 120hz is a very smooth experience , specially for single player titles , but works perfectly well for Yeah there is simply diminishing returns the higher you go. 240 you can slightly feel the difference in change from 120, but 360hz you can not tell the change from 240 How much do you care about bang for your buck? The higher the hz, the pricier it gets, exponentially so. My buddy has a 240 Hz monitor and I absolutely can tell on that one. These are only compatible with 144Hz, so let us do the math for you. 144hz is a frame time of just under 7ms. e. So now I’m thinking “do I get the same 1440p 144hz (can be oc to 165hz) monitor or get a 1080p 240hz like I was thinking about. 240 hz is better because the frames will be displayed more evenly even if you don't have 240 fps For example with 60 hz monitor and only 45 fps in game then the monitor cannot show those frames for same amount of time and will have to alternate displaying 1 and 2 frames so those 45 fps will create stuttering motion but if you have 240 hz monitor then those 45 fps will be showing 5 frames and 6 Change your current display to 30hz then change it to 60hz and understand the difference of how it feels. 16 ms, 144hz is "only" 6. I just dont get it how can a 2. 60-120, 120-240, 240-360). I can hit 144hz 4k in the games I play (fortnite, CSGO and others) so that's not an issue. Both has similar price (in Indonesia) and even saw AOC with cheaper price with the BenQ. reaching 4 ms average response times with low overshoot (so ideal overdrive setting) is quite hard for an ips monitor. Most definitely I personally would not be able to feel a difference in an actual gaming session. Check blur busters for some ultra low motion blur (ULMB) monitor they give you more edge compared to just 1080p 240hz , also do not go for 1440p 144hz the higher the resolution the more frame drop you will get during high animation frames , like ultimate and quick scopes and trust me frame drops happen on 2k monitor unless you have 3090 or a 6900xt Gpu For me right now the best 1080p 240 hz (I had a 144hz BenQ for few years before now I've a 240 BenQ XL2546) Most people will tell you it's not really noticable, but after being used to 240 for 1/2 years When I switch to 144 it feels "laggy". Just because a monitor can give 240 frames on a 240 hz monitor doesn't mean that it will feel smoother. But the factors include: Brand, your pc specs etc. Not quite impressed with the fancy new 2K (1440p) and 4K resolutions? The biggest difference I noticed was in motion clarity. But after playing 144hz and switching to 60hz was incredibly terrible experience. Other than that 144Hz is plenty smooth. I used to have 240hz TN, which didn't feel better than 144hz ips either. at 480 hz your response time will be lower than a TN 240 or 360 hz. A 240hz monitor reduces it to 4 ms hence the jump to 240 isn't as pronounced since our ability to perceive increased frames reduces at such low time intervals and the absolute difference is reduced. And the screen will look MUCH better due to the IPS. 60hz is a nonstarter and I can't go back unless it's for console titles. 1000hz at minimum, but they even have 4000hz to 8000hz mice. I’ve been really happy with it so far, but today I noticed a dead pixel and now have to return it. I suspect at some point 240 will become the norm for mid range products eventually as 120-144 is now standard for all 'gaming' monitors even at the low end of the price / spec range, but a lot of people won't see any difference. There's a noticeable difference between 144 Hz and 240Hz, motion is a lot clearer and mouse inputs feel much smoother and more responsive, especially in FPS games but you can feel it generally. This gets even worse with 360Hz displays. While the basic idea is right, having 60 fps on a 144hz monitor can feel nicer than it does on a 60hz monitor. I'd say the decision comes down to what games you are mainly playing. Interestingly enough though when I went back to 144hz I did "feel" just slightly more sluggish so I guess the 240hz did make a difference but for me at least it was Reddit LOVES high FPS, so be prepared for a lot of "144hz or gtfo" replies. Good idea to invest an a higher hz mouse too. This is my personal opinion of course. Played on the 240hz for several hours and just wasn't impressed. Obv. Hello guys 240 HZ Without G-Sync Vs 144HZ With G-Sync ? I was looking at BenQ XL2420G 144HZ G-Sync and AOC AGON 24. for competitive games like cs go you actually have an advantage woth 240 hz over 120 hz. I haven't had any problems with the lower refresh rate, or even noticed it for that matter. Problem is, i've only got a 4070 Ti. Yes! I went from 60 to 144, then 144 to 240. See full list on rtings. And the answer is no, the difference is minimal and won't affect your enjoyment of the game. 55hz is a noticeable difference from 60hz, my girlfriends 75hz and 144hz ips screens have fairly noticeable difference, but not as much as 60hz to 144hz. Happy shopping. 240hz or even 360hz, if your PC can handle it, will make your mouse feel like a damn laser beam compared to 144hz. Ultrawide I would get just to play my other games like strategy ones etc. All 27" 1440p monitors. 5 with 244hz. not as much of a difference than 60 to 144 but I can def tell the difference. 144Hz vs 240Hz isn't that big of a jump and the visual clarity from 1440p really helps, not only in gaming but everyday task is much more enjoyable especially if you only use 1 monitor setup. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now and also a 144hz monitor. Given that hitting super high frame rates shouldn’t be much of a problem with the new RTX 3080, my general question is whether the benefits of a 24. 144Hz(27GL850) was that the 240Hz monitor was better but that might be due to better response times since it seemed faster even at similar refresh rates and it didn't seem better at refresh rates above 180Hz which was probably was the best that its response time could do. I currently use Acer 24 144hz GN246GL, it’s my first 144hz monitor have no complaints, but I have nothing to compare with. It's more a quality of life improvement than anything else. 5″ 1080p 360 Hz monitor to play FPS games like VALORANT. 5x the price. 94 ms. like one of Linus' videos did). Or check it out in the app stores   144hz vs 240 hz vs 360hz | DyAc question . ) If diminishing returns is enough to steer you away, I would go for 144hz or 120hz; Hey all, Was lucky enough to score a 3080Ti recently and am trying to decide between a 4k 144Hz monitor or a 1440p 240Hz monitor. The we did 120hz vs 144hz got some missed some , then 144hz vs 240hz, there is an improvement in fluidity , and any sort of ghosting or “blur” is 100% gone, movement looks sharp. It’s all subjective, but for me personally I see very little difference above the 144hz mark. The difference between 60-120-240 is HUGE!! The difference between 240-360 is negligible. If you can sell it or use it as a second monitor, maybe it makes more sense. . all were noticeable Reply The jump from 144hz to 240hz isn't as noticeable as 60 -> 144 is, but it's definitely something you can see and feel as you get used to 240. I'd say if you're already on the fence then I'd go for it, but otherwise it is a steep price for upgrading from 144Hz to 240Hz. I'm thinking about upgrading to a 4080 together with either a 27" 1440p 240 hz monitor or a 32" 4k 144hz. Also with that reasoning, sure a 144 hz will make the game smoother but only give a 10ms advantage as compared to a 60hz. True GOAT is 1440p at 165hz G-Sync Monitor (or 144hz should be basically zero difference). Contrast is ok. If you’re looking for the best color stability and viewing angles, you should settle for IPS monitors. The TL;DR of it was the pro gamers saying 60 hz to 144hz has a huge impact, and 144hz to 240 hz was more a "nice to have but not very impactful" type deal. Don't buy one expecting it to give you a huge advantage over 144Hz owners, it won't. Best combos of performance and value. Monitors with higher refresh rates tend to have less ghosting for example, so even if the framerate is lower, the image can for example be slightly less blurry when there is a lot of motion. in the overall evaluation of a laptop it is a minor feature to look at, because for competitive e-sport you wouldnt use a 17 inch laptop anyways and the difference between 60 and 90 fps is way more important so thats what you Personally, specially if you are going above 24 inch I would choose 4k/144hz or 1440p/144hz, if I'm not wrong the 3080ti should play the latest games at 4k/60 ultra settings at least with dlss when needed, so going enough above 60fps shouldn't be an issue with medium/high settings, you can always use dlss performance too. Now 144 vs 240 fps The fastest humans react in about 170 ms. At first I was worried I would use the 240 for some games but I haven’t felt the need to use my 240 hz display for gaming since the switch!!! Exactly. 5 ms advantage(144->240) can be that valuable. It isn't based entirely on refresh of the monitor. Answer: 144Hz is better in the vast majority of cases: they are cheaper, the required FPS is easier to achieve, and the improvements that 144Hz brings over 60Hz are much greater than what 240Hz brings over 144Hz. But specifically in terms of 240 Hz vs 144 Hz - downgrading from 240 to 165 hasn't been noticeable at all. Input latency, contrast ratios, and GPU settings come into play for "smoothness". 60 -> 120/144hz - the jump is massive, like unreal the level of difference. For 240, the best I’ve come across is literally 2. you should try playing competitive fps games at 1440p. i go for 1440p 240 hz , else 4k 144hz for mainly single player games. My takeaways: 144hz is night and day to 60hz especially for competitive shooters, 165hz to 144hz is barely discernable and I often leave my monitor on 144hz mode, g-sync (or freesync) is an absolute must, 4K to 1440p is very tolerable going from 28" to 24", and playing on my 1080p@60hz laptop when I game at my friends' is now practically torture. You will wonder how did you ever play on 60hz. I’ve been using a Razer Blade for the past few years with a 1080p 240Hz monitor, so both options would be a resolution upgrade but one would be a refresh rate downgrade (although the difference between 144 and 240 Hz might not amount to much). there is a difference, linus tech tips made a great comparison video about it. Now does it make me play a lot better than the 144hz one? No. the diff from 144 to 240 is'nt extremely small , it's average or very noticable. For example i own a asus pg279q which is a 1440 240hz monitor. At 240 Hz certain transitions are longer than frametime, so the pixel doesn't even get to fully change it's color before another frame is rendered. I've had the ASUS PG279Q (144 could overclock to 165, 1440p), the PG258Q (240, 1080p) and I'm now currently using the ACER Predator XB272 (240, 1080p). In addition, settling for a 144Hz, IPS, would be your sweet spot. As far as I know, a 240Hz LCD takes 4. On 240Hz (if you can get >240 fps) you can see everything much more clearly and 144Hz looks ever so slightly blurry in comparison. If you have hardware to run 1440p a 144Hz 1440p screen should be a easy choice. These 240 Hz monitors aren't meant for those kinds of games, they appeal to a very specific niche, which is professional gamers or at the very least very competitive gamers. 144 -> 240 - The jump is no where near as big, but once you've played competitive games such as shooters, very kind of intense games, valorant, r6, cs:go and so on, you will definitely notice a difference between the two. 2 ms (1000 * 1/240) to scanout the image. Mar 13, 2024 · 240Hz will give you a small advantage over other gamers playing at a lower refresh rate and it will make the gameplay more enjoyable and immersive, but it won’t make you a better player! A 144Hz monitor can show 144 unique frames per second with 6. 60 to 144 has more than double the increase than 144 to 240 despite the difference in refresh rate actually being lower. the refresh window for 240hz is 4. The jump from 60hz to 144hz felt immensily higher than from 144hz to 240hz, to give a reference. 27" 4k 60hz (the monitor my employer gave me, not to play games, but sshhh). Unless you are super into competitive gaming/esports, I think the best move would be to just go for a 240 hz 1440p IPS, they are cheaper than 360hz tn, colors are MUCH better, viewing angles not even comparable. Cheers. Therefore 240hz monitor is pointless for PUBG. We should honestly consider whether it even makes sense to keep pushing frametime down once it's as short or shorter than pixel response time. My personal experience with 240Hz(27GN750) vs. I'm probably leaning towards a 32" 4k 144hz as that seems to have a few better options. It will also be a lot less work on your rig if you cap it a little over 240. 4k60 is better for me than 1440p144hz, without any doubt in my mind. and going from 1440p to 2160p is'nt that big it's an average ( similaire to 144 => 240 ) it all depends what he play , if it only comp like cs go ,valorant etc. For comparison: after playing couple of months with 240hz benq i switched to 144hz 1440p and it didnt bother me. Comparing 240hz against 144hz, assuming your natural reaction time is on-par with the best in the world, and your PC/Peripherals are top notch and tuned properly for low input latency - at best you stand to gain 2. It's quite hard to even notice the difference between 144hz and 240hz. 144hz vs 165hz, you run into diminishing returns and I really don't think it's worth basing your monitor purchase on that. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Motion is a lot more satisfying and games are more enjoyable with high hz/fps. I feel like i wouldn't be able to take advantage of the 4K monitor. With my pc i can drive all shooters (from cod to apex to overwatch to destiny) between 200-240 as i cap at 240. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz Linus Tech Tips has a pretty cool video with some pro gamers comparing 144hz vs 240hz. Unlike VA, IPS can offer you great images and lower response times when compared to the former. 94ms between each frame, whereas a 240Hz monitor shows 240 frames with 4. 240hz vs 144hz= less than 3ms 144hz vs 60hz= 10ms If you only care about competitive games sure go for it. I can notice a side by side comparison using the same monitor (but one of them is the 144hz model the other is 240) but its only slightly. xzkhbg ttgnii dpmp mtkzs tjt ogkk adpljs cxyn jowjft ucfhrq